M.
Lynne Corn
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
Under
federal law, local governments are compensated through various programs for
reductions to their property tax bases due to the presence of most
federally owned land. These lands cannot be taxed, but may create demand
for services such as fire protection, police cooperation, or simply longer
roads to skirt the federal property. Some of these programs are run by specific agencies
and apply only to that agency’s land. The most widely applicable program,
administered by the Department of the Interior (DOI), applies to many
types of federally owned land, and is called “Payments in Lieu of Taxes,”
or PILT. The authorized level of PILT payments is calculated under a
complex formula. This report addresses only the PILT program administered by
DOI. There is no PILT-like program generally applicable to military lands,
but a small fraction of military lands are eligible for the DOI PILT
program. Furthermore, PILT does not apply to Indian-owned lands, virtually
none of which are subject to local taxes.
This report explains PILT payments, with an analysis of the five major factors
affecting the calculation of a payment to a given county. It also
describes the effects of certain changes in PILT in 2008. Previously,
annual appropriations were necessary to fund PILT, but a 2008 provision (in P.L.
110-343) for mandatory spending ensured that, beginning with FY2008 and
continuing through the payment to be made in 2012, all counties will
receive 100% of the authorized payment. On July 6, 2012, the President
signed P.L. 112-141, containing a provision extending mandatory spending
to FY2013.
Other issues have been the inclusion of additional lands under the PILT
program, particularly some or all Indian lands, which are not now eligible
for PILT. Most categories of Indian-owned lands cannot be taxed by local
governments, though they generally enjoy county services. In some
counties, this means a very substantial portion of the land is not taxable. The
remaining tax burden (for roads, schools, fire and police protection,
etc.) therefore falls more heavily on other property owners. To help
compensate for this burden, some counties have proposed that Indian lands
(variously defined) be included among those eligible for PILT payments.
Examples of other lands mentioned from time to time for inclusion are
those of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the
Departments of Defense and Homeland Security. In addition, some counties
would like to revisit the compensation formula to emphasize a payment rate more
similar to property tax rates (which vary widely among counties), a
feature that would be a major change in counties with high property
values. Finally, for lands in the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS),
some have argued that all lands of the system should be eligible for PILT,
rather than limiting the PILT payments to lands reserved from the public
domain and excluding PILT payments for acquired lands. The exclusion of
NWRS-acquired lands affects primarily counties in eastern states.
With the extension of mandatory spending to FY2013, the program would return to
funding through annual appropriations in FY2014. Over the next few years,
the larger debate for Congress might then be summarized as three
decisions: (1) whether to approve future extensions of mandatory spending
(either temporary or permanent); (2) whether to make the diametrically opposed
choice of reducing the program through appropriations or changing the PILT
formula; and (3) whether to add or subtract any lands to the list of those
now eligible for PILT payments. Background on all three issues is
discussed here.
Date of Report: July 25, 2012
Number of Pages: 24
Order Number: RL31392
Price: $29.95
Document available via
e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To Order:
RL31392.pdf
to use the SECURE SHOPPING CART
e-mail congress@pennyhill.com
Phone
301-253-0881
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card
number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail
or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.
Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP
or #CRSreports