Jody Feder
Legislative Attorney
Tadlock Cowan
Analyst in Natural Resources and Rural Development
The
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has long been accused of unlawfully
discriminating against minority and female farmers in the management of
its various programs, particularly in its Farm Service Agency loan
programs. While USDA has taken concrete steps to address these allegations
of discrimination, the results of these efforts have been criticized by some. Meanwhile,
some minority and female farmers who have alleged discrimination by USDA have filed
various lawsuits under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Pigford v. Glickman, filed on
behalf of African-American farmers, is probably the most widely known,
although Native American and female farmers also filed suit in Keepseagle
v. Vilsack and Love v. Vilsack, respectively.
In addition, a group of Hispanic farmers filed a similar lawsuit against USDA
in October 2000. The case, Garcia v. Vilsack, involved allegations
that USDA unlawfully discriminated against all similarly situated Hispanic
farmers with respect to credit transactions and disaster benefits in violation
of the ECOA, which prohibits, among other things, race, color, and national
origin discrimination against credit applicants. The suit further claimed
that USDA violated the ECOA and the APA by systematically failing to
investigate complaints of discrimination, as required by USDA regulations.
After nearly a decade of litigation and numerous rulings on procedural and substantive
issues, the Garcia plaintiffs exhausted their final avenue of appeal to
have their claims heard as a class action. As a result, the Garcia plaintiffs
who wish to pursue their available claims in court must do so
individually, or they and other eligible Hispanic farmers may participate
in a settlement process established by USDA. Settlement claims must be filed by March
25, 2013.
In addition to an analysis of the Garcia lawsuit, this report also
discusses several possible options for Congress to consider if it wishes
to respond to the Garcia dispute.
Date of Report: February 22, 2013
Number of Pages: 18
Order Number: R40988
Price: $29.95
To Order:
e-mail congress@pennyhill.com
Phone
301-253-0881
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card
number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail
or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.