Eugene
H. Buck
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
M. Lynne Corn
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
Kristina Alexander
Legislative Attorney
Pervaze A. Sheikh
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
Robert Meltz
Legislative Attorney
The
Endangered Species Act (ESA; P.L. 93-205, 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1543) was enacted to
increase protection for, and provide for the recovery of, vanishing
wildlife and vegetation. Under ESA, species of plants and animals (both
vertebrate and invertebrate) can be listed as endangered or threatened
according to assessments of their risk of extinction. Habitat loss is the
primary cause for listing species. Once a species is listed, powerful
legal tools are available to aid its recovery and protect its habitat.
Accordingly, when certain resources are associated with listed species— such
as water in arid regions like California, old growth timber in national
forests, or free-flowing rivers—ESA is seen as an obstacle to continued or
greater human use of these resources. ESA may also be controversial
because dwindling species are usually harbingers of broader ecosystem decline
or conflicts. As a result, ESA is considered a primary driver of large-scale
ecosystem restoration issues.
The 112th Congress may conduct oversight of the implementation of various
federal programs and laws that address threatened and endangered species.
This could range from addressing listing and delisting decisions under ESA
to justifying funding levels for international conservation programs. The
112th Congress may also face specific resource conflicts involving threatened
and endangered species, including managing water supplies and ecosystem
restoration in San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers
Delta in California (i.e., Bay-Delta) and managing water supplies in the
Klamath Basin. In the 112th Congress, resource-specific issues may be
addressed independently, whereas oversight on the implementation of ESA may be addressed
in debates about particular species (e.g., wolves, polar bears, and salmon).
P.L. 112-10 (final appropriations for FY2011) included a legislative
delisting of a portion of the reintroduced Rocky Mountain gray wolf population.
The 112th Congress may consider legislation related to global climate change
that includes provisions that would allocate funds to the Fish and
Wildlife Service’s endangered species program and/or to related funds to
assist species adaptation to climate change. Other major issues concerning
ESA in recent years have included the role of science in decision making,
critical habitat (CH) designation, incentives for property owners, and appropriate
protection for listed species, among others.
The authorization for spending under ESA expired on October 1, 1992. The
prohibitions and requirements of ESA remain in force, even in the absence
of an authorization, and funds have been appropriated to implement the
administrative provisions of ESA in each subsequent fiscal year. Proposals
to reauthorize and extensively amend ESA were last considered in the 109th Congress,
but none were enacted. No legislative proposals were introduced in the 110th or
111th Congresses to reauthorize ESA.
This report discusses oversight issues and legislation introduced in the 112th Congress
to address ESA implementation and management of endangered and threatened
species.
Date of Report: June 14, 2012
Number of Pages: 26
Order Number: R41608
Price: $29.95
Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order: Visit
http://www.pennyhill.com/index.php?option=com_jmsfileseller&view=document&doc_id=50769&Itemid=0&order_id=R41608, e-mail
Penny
Hill Press,or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American
Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card.
Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred
and receive priority processing.
Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP
or #CRSreports